Idea
A limit of the form at that gives the indeterminate is decided entirely by the lowest-order nonzero terms of the numerator and denominator. Instead of differentiating repeatedly (L'Hopital), expand both functions as Taylor (Maclaurin) series around and compare the leading powers.
If near with , then The whole problem reduces to finding the first surviving power of each and the coefficient sitting on it.
Method
- Recognize . Confirm numerator and denominator both vanish at the target point (shift to first if needed).
- Expand to a guessed order. Substitute the standard series for each building block, keeping terms up to some order .
- Find the leading power. Cancel terms that vanish; the lowest power that does not cancel is the order (numerator) and (denominator).
- Re-expand if you cancelled too early. If the leading terms cancelled and you only kept with too small, go back and keep one more order.
- Read off the ratio (only when ).
Toolbox: standard Maclaurin series
| Function | Expansion near |
|---|---|
For a variable exponent, rewrite a power as an exponential first: , expand the exponent, then exponentiate using the series.
Mini-example
Evaluate .
- Numerator: , so , .
- Denominator: , so , .
- Ratio: equal powers, so the limit is
Why it beats L'Hopital
When the leading powers are high (here both are , and in the power-tower question both are ), L'Hopital forces two or more rounds of messy product/chain differentiation. One Taylor expansion to the matching order delivers every coefficient at once.
Exam trick: Expand only as far as the first nonzero power, but be ready to go one order deeper if the leading terms cancel. The classic trap is stopping at , seeing again, and panicking — keep the next term and the ratio appears immediately.