A power series ∑n=0∞cn(z−a)n converges on a disk centered at a; its radius of convergence R is the half-width of that disk. The Cauchy–Hadamard theorem gives R directly from the coefficients cn, using the limsup so the formula is always valid — unlike the ratio test, which needs the limit of ∣cn+1/cn∣ to exist.
The theorem
R1=limsupn→∞∣cn∣1/n,R=n→∞limsup∣cn∣1/n1.
Conventions: if the limsup is 0 then R=∞ (converges everywhere); if it is ∞ then R=0 (converges only at the center). The series converges absolutely for ∣z−a∣<R and diverges for ∣z−a∣>R; behavior exactly on ∣z−a∣=R must be checked separately.
How to apply
- Identify the coefficients cn — the part multiplying (z−a)n. If the powers are of some inner expression u, substitute u first and solve for the radius in u.
- Compute L=limsupn→∞∣cn∣1/n. When a true limit exists you may use lim in place of limsup.
- Invert: R=1/L.
- Undo any substitution. If u=bx+d, then ∣u∣<R becomes ∣x+d/b∣<R/∣b∣, so the radius in x is R/∣b∣ — the linear inner factor b scales the radius by 1/∣b∣.
Useful root-test limits: n1/n→1, (an)1/n→1, a1/n→1 for a>0, and (1−n1)n→e−1.
Mini-example
Find R for ∑n=1∞n3nxn. Here cn=n3n, so
∣cn∣1/n=n1/n3⟶13=3⟹R=31.
The series converges for ∣x∣<31. (At the endpoints: x=−31 gives the convergent alternating harmonic series, x=31 the divergent harmonic series.)
Pitfall: when the variable sits inside a linear factor like (bx+d)n, substitute u=bx+d, find the radius Ru in u, then divide by ∣b∣ to get the radius in x. Forgetting this factor is the classic distractor.