Many konkur problems hand you only the signs of and on the two sides of a point and ask what — or its one-sided derivatives at — must look like. The whole trick is to read two layers of monotonicity off those two signs, then use boundedness to pin down a one-sided limit of .
The two-layer sign reading
Think of as a function in its own right. On an interval :
| sign of | what does | sign of | what does |
|---|---|---|---|
| increasing | increasing ( convex) | ||
| decreasing | decreasing ( concave) |
The first sign controls ; the second sign controls . So '' means is decreasing while its slope is rising toward (a decreasing-but-flattening, convex piece), and '' means is increasing while its slope is falling (an increasing-but-flattening, concave piece).
Squeezing out a one-sided limit of f'
Apply the Monotone Convergence Theorem to , not to . Suppose on we have (so is increasing) and (so is bounded above by ). An increasing function bounded above has a finite limit at the right end:
The bound that makes monotone comes from ; the bound that makes it bounded comes from . Mirror image on the right: decreasing () and positive () gives a finite (or ) limit
and because is strictly decreasing the inequality is strict for every interior .
From limit of f' to the one-sided derivative
The missing link is the derivative-limit theorem (a clean corollary of the Mean Value Theorem):
If is continuous at and differentiable just to one side, and exists (finite or ), then the left-hand derivative equals that limit: .
So a derivative cannot have a jump or oscillatory discontinuity from a one-sided monotone limit — the one-sided derivative at is that one-sided limit. This is exactly what lets you conclude things like ', so is a local-min-type corner', or compare the two one-sided slopes to decide differentiability at .
How to apply it (4 moves)
- Translate signs. Convert each ' sign' to monotonicity of , and each ' sign' to monotonicity of .
- Bound . Use the sign of itself ( or ) as the bound that the monotone approaches.
- Take the one-sided limit. Monotone bounded exists (or is ); it equals the relevant sup/inf.
- Identify the one-sided derivative. By the derivative-limit theorem this limit is ; compare and to settle differentiability or the corner type at .
Mini-example
Let be continuous on with for and for . Left of : increasing and , so . Right of : decreasing and , so . Hence : the two one-sided slopes differ, so need not be differentiable at , and is a downward corner (local minimum of ). A concrete witness is near -style functions, or simply any V-shaped-but-curved profile matching the signs.
Exam trick: Keep the two derivatives in separate lanes — the sign of tells you about (rising/falling), the sign of tells you about (rising/falling). The single most useful consequence is that ' monotone and one-signed near ' forces to exist and to equal the one-sided derivative — so you may read those slopes straight off the supremum/infimum, never needing a formula for .